Re: Alternative formats for IDs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 3 Jan 2006 07:04:23 +0200 Yaakov Stein wrote:

>  
> > Word is of course out of the question since it is proprietary,
> > undocumented, and unstable.  I hope we have consensus on that.
> 
> Sorry, no such consensus.

Well, you certainly don't have agreement/concensus that MS Word
should be used either.

> I don't see why the editor you use needs to be open-standard.
> As far as I know the IETF is attempting to standardize IP-related
> communications protocols, not editors.
>  
> I do hope that the monitor and keyboard you are using
> while reading and sending emails have their schematic diagrams
> in the public domain. And please do not write any IETF documents
> while using a mouse from a certain proprietary company who holds
> dozens of patents on mouse technology.

No need to be silly.


and from a different email from Y(J)S:
> Which is exactly the reason all the other SDOs
> use MS Word for input and PDF for output.

*all* others do?  That's hard to accept.

---
~Randy

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]