Has an email list been set up for this effort yet? On 12/22/05, Pekka Savola <pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 21 Dec 2005, The IESG wrote: > > - An update to RFC 2716 to bring EAP-TLS into standards track, clarify > > specification, interoperability, and implementation issues gathered over the > > years, and update the document to meet the requirements of RFC 3748, RFC 4017, > > and EAP keying framework documents. > > Backwards compatibility with RFC 2716 is a requirement. > > Is there a particular reason why the proposed charter does not mention > EAP-TTLS? > > I know very little about different EAP types, but as a potential > operator and user of EAP, I'd definitely want to see focus on > something like EAP-TTLS. > > Given that EAP-TTLS seems to be becoming an industry standard in > certain scenarios, it would be useful to clarify the relation of the > work of this proposed WG wrt EAP-TTLS in the charter. The relation > may already be obvious to those who've been working on that space > more, but as an EAP user, I'd like to make it explicit to ensure folks > are on the same page.. > > -- > Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the > Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds." > Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings > > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > Ietf@xxxxxxxx > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf > -- Clint (JOATMON) Chaplin Wireless Security Technologist Wireless Standards Manager _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf