> Ned Freed wrote: > >> (Unicode lacks a no-op, a meaningless octet, one that could > >> be added or removed without causing any change to the > >> meaning of the text). > > NBSP is used for this purpose. > My proposal u+FFFE was nonsense, I wanted u+FEFF. The latter > is "zero width nbsp" (aka BOM), did you also mean this beast ? Yes. > Not a no-op in some cases wrt hyphenation and composition, so > it's probably not what Tom wants. It's close enough. Ned _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf