Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> >> the specification" is way too high for that.
> 
> Too high for what?  Instead of arguing principles Eric, needs to 
> indicate what specific technical work that is excluded by this language 
> is actually essential to the goals of DKIM.

Dave,

You keep making statements like that without a shred of support for
your position. You seem to think that you alone dictate the conditions
under which a working group should be chartered. You are mistaken,
and IMHO your efforts are hindering progress of the the DKIM effort.

Keith

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]