Hi. THe IESG had a call today to discuss role of pesci in the plenary. People generally believed that it is too early to give more than a brief status report on pesci. Brian will let people know that he has organized a design team, they had a draft, there was a BOF. But we feel that we'll be in a much better position to present specific recommendations to the community later. As such, there is no need to move pesci elsewhere. I want to stress that this does not imply that pesci is not important or that community input is not required. It simply means we're too early to focus a significant plenary discussion on pesci. I'm hoping to convince Brian to describe the process he thinks should be used to approve pesci documents. There's a bit of a problem in that he won't be able the shepherd them. So, he can make recommendations about the process but until we pick document shepherds no one can say anything definitive about the process. --Sam _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf