Re: Oops

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





--On tirsdag, november 01, 2005 08:13:26 +0100 Frank Ellermann <nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Brian E Carpenter wrote:

I'm told that my recollection is faulty

It's not, that breach of RfC 2418 chapter 4
caused two of the three pending appeals.

to be accurate:
the message that MARID was concluded did contain information about why.

<http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-announce/current/msg00505.html>

WRT pending appeals, these are listed on

<http://www.ietf.org/IESG/Appeals.html>

The two appeals do not concern directly MARID's closing, although one might surmise that if MARID had been successful, this mess would have been less messy.

                  Harald (just reading public notices)


_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]