--On tirsdag, november 01, 2005 08:13:26 +0100 Frank Ellermann
<nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Brian E Carpenter wrote:
I'm told that my recollection is faulty
It's not, that breach of RfC 2418 chapter 4
caused two of the three pending appeals.
to be accurate:
the message that MARID was concluded did contain information about why.
<http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-announce/current/msg00505.html>
WRT pending appeals, these are listed on
<http://www.ietf.org/IESG/Appeals.html>
The two appeals do not concern directly MARID's closing, although one might
surmise that if MARID had been successful, this mess would have been less
messy.
Harald (just reading public notices)
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf