Avri Doria wrote:
Hi,
I can agree with SHOULD and SHOULD NOT, the only problem i had in
writing it that way is i could not meet the specification requirement
for specifying the conditions under which the requirement would not
apply. I did not want to careless create loopholes.
My main concern is that these issues be a formal requirement of the
community's decision in where we meet. And that they be taken seriously.
Forgive me Avri and Jordi, but why?
I've been going to IETF meetings since 1988 and I really can't remember
the Secretariat fouling it up. Did I miss a problem? Could people not
get to France or Minnesota? Is this something we really need to do?
Eliot
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf