Harald, The trouble is - know it or not - this "language choice" is the result of a lot of wrangling. Your comment is a late comer to the "party" as we have been round and round on this as well as other issues relating to this document. What you see now is the current negotiated position, and it would be very nice if we did not have yet another round of negotiations because someone else is not exactly happy with what we have... -- Eric --> -----Original Message----- --> From: ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx --> [mailto:ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of --> Harald Tveit Alvestrand --> Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2005 5:23 PM --> To: Stewart Bryant; iesg@xxxxxxxx --> Cc: pwe3@xxxxxxxx; ietf@xxxxxxxx --> Subject: Re: [PWE3] Last Call: 'IANA Allocations for pseudo --> Wire Edge to --> Edge Emulation (PWE3)' to BCP --> --> --> --> --> --On onsdag, oktober 05, 2005 16:18:29 +0100 Stewart Bryant --> <stbryant@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: --> --> > It has been suggested that we should change this to: --> > --> > "PW Type values 1025 through 4096, and 32767 are allocated through --> > the IETF Consensus Process" --> --> The most stringent 2434 term is "standards action", I --> think... I would --> encourage using 2434 language wherever possible... --> --> --> _______________________________________________ --> Ietf mailing list --> Ietf@xxxxxxxx --> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf --> _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf