>>>>> "wayne" == wayne <wayne@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
wayne> In <7E876E12-3D43-4BFB-8F5B-76C3E985A610@xxxxxx> Andrew
wayne> Newton <andy@xxxxxx> writes:
>> But since you brought this up: if you (the author of the
>> document) do not consider this to be an experiment, then
>> perhaps the IETF should not publish SPF as an Experimental RFC.
wayne> I asked for the IESG to not consider the SPF I-D to be
wayne> experiemental. It was turned down. According to Ted,
wayne> *none* of the IESG members expressed interest in changing
wayne> the status from Experiemental.
As a point of fact, I only saw requests from you to publish as a
proposed standard or some other standards track document rather than
experimental.
Of course I would not have seen private communication between you and
Ted.
however if you do not consider SPF an experiment, standards track is
not the only status to consider.
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf