In <430F3806.4050402@xxxxxxxxxx> Keith Moore <moore@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> I agree that getting authentication into the email protocols is a good >> thing, but TLS does not achieve much more than SPF/Sender-ID in that >> respect. DKIM is a much better platform. > > Not clear. [a summary of the status of DKIM that I generally agree with] > > I think DKIM is fixable, but if it stays in its current form it will > only delay adoption of effective anti-phishing and anti-spam solutions > by a few more years. What would those "effective anti-phishing and anti-spam solutions" be? I guess by "effective" I include the requirement of fairly rapid adoption, which kind of rules out things like PGP and S/MIME. -wayne _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf