Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Hi Stuart,

Although implementaitons are not strictly required for Proposed Standard publication, I do think that it is interesting to know whether people have implemented, or intend to implement our standards.

I have received a couple of private confirmations that LLMNR is implemented in WinCE 5.0. I have also been told that it has been implemented by ETRI, as documented in the following paper:

http://www-users.cs.umn.edu/~jjeong/publications/international-conference/icact2004-jaehoon.pdf

Margaret

At 6:52 PM -0700 8/25/05, Stuart Cheshire wrote:
I don't see anything in RFC 2026 criteria that hinges on whether
Microsoft intends to implement a protocol.

Is doesn't have to be Microsoft.

Is there *anyone* out there who has implemented this, or plans to?

Or am I just being old-fashioned in thinking that the idea behind a
protocol specified in an RFC is that someone somewhere might implement it?

Stuart Cheshire <cheshire@xxxxxxxxx>
 * Wizard Without Portfolio, Apple Computer, Inc.
 * www.stuartcheshire.org


_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]