-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote: > not speaking for anyone but myself..... > > one matter of principle: > > are you of the opinion that the IESG should try to police which > experiments get run on the Internet by refusing to publish RFCs > documenting possibly-conflicting experments? Let me phrase it this way: the IESG should not sanction conflicting experiments by publishing conflicting specifications, especially not if those specifications were explicitly requested by the IESG as individual submissions after the demise of a working group that had previously already shown consensus on not allowing that conflict which has only _now_ become a reality in one of the individual submissions. Julian. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDDlonwL7PKlBZWjsRAiYZAJ0eTdjybYoeUHDPenw2bAJ0J1+rdQCgglwP j9QcH7h68l1nDcrGH7MvxIs= =eEqD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf