Re: Revised Last Call: 'SSH Transport Layer Encryption Modes' to Proposed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





--On 24. august 2005 17:24 -0400 Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@xxxxxxx> wrote:

    iesg> It is customary to include normative references to
    iesg> informational documents describing cryptographic algorithms.
    iesg> However the procedures of RFC 3967 require that this
    iesg> normative reference be called out in the IETF last call.


For the record I'd like to say that RFc 3967 seems poorly considered
and I don't think strikes a reasonable balance between efficiency and
quality.

In particular RFC 3967 does not allow classes of documents such as
cryptographic algorithms to be exempted from last call notice, only
single documents.

For the record, I'd like to say that I disagree.

I think that if we search for an "easiest possible way to implement" the RFC 3967 requirement, we will end up with a single web-maintained document of "documents that are OK to refer to". Doing explicit action to add each sensible crypto document to that list as it comes out doesn't strike me as onerous.

                 Harald



_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]