RE: Last Call: 'Tags for Identifying Languages' to BCP

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



JFC,

  In March, 1995, when RFC 1766 was published, the BCP track did not exist.
The Standards Track was being used for things that were not protocols
and did not fit well into the 3-stage process.  Since BCPs are subject to
the same consensus judging and scrutiny as standards-track documents, it's
been common practice to obsolete old standards-track documents with BCPs
when it's reasonable to think that the original document would have been
a BCP if BCPs had existed at the time.

  Bill

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]