RE: Stopping loss of transparency...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> >>
> >>>yes , thats exactly what it  does , they call it  "Portal-Guided  
> >>>Entrance" on port :80 and 443.
> >>
> >>Does this work on port 443? I would assume the SSL security checks  
> >>wouldn't accept this.
> > 
> > I believe the FQDN is not encrypted, though the part of the 
> url after the
> > FQDN is (so one could redirect based on https:// and/or 
> specific FQDN's
> > (whether http or https).
> 
> That's beside the point. According to RFC 2818 section 3.1, 
> where a hostname
> is given in an https: URL, the client MUST check this 
> hostname against the
> name in the server's certificate. This check will fail if the 
> connection is
> redirected to a non-transparent proxy (assuming that the web 
> browser is
> complying to RFC 2818, no CA in the browser's trusted CA list has been
> compromised, and the crypto is not broken).

The redirection or hijacking happens way before the browser gets involved
(much lower layer).  My guess (again just one possibility)is that the portal
is spoofing the address of the original destination and either sending a
reset or some kind of redirect.  Websense is one example of enterprise
software that does this, which is why I mentioned it.

nick

> -- 
> David Hopwood <david.nospam.hopwood@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@xxxxxxxx
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
> 


_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]