(bundled responses) Spencer Dawkins wrote: ... > I have NO idea what > > > > Would you prefer longer meetings or shorter meetings? > Shorter meetings with more overlaps > No change > Longer meetings with fewer overlaps > > > means! I'm answering it, assuming that it refers to the one-hour > sessions that sometimes get doubled-up into two-hour sessions, but if > you mean something else, please let us know. It was meant to refer to the Friday morning controversy- should we have more parallel sessions and end Thursday night, or fewer parallel sessions and end Friday night,or do what we do now. We didn't identify the ambiguity until too late. Sorry about that - it's very hard to get a questionnaire 100% unambiguous, so we may have to revisit this question another time. Rob Evans wrote: >>My problem is what "herring bone" seating layout is. I don't understand >>why the question is asked either. Why is it important whether people >>attended those sessions? > > > If you say "yes," it pops up another question asking if you preferred > it to the usual classroom style of seating. > > Herringbone seating is where the rows either side of the aisle are at > an angle of about 120 degrees instead of 180 degrees. I think people who noticed the difference would have no trouble with that question - the idea was to see whether it improved interaction during the sessions. Michael Richardson wrote: ... > A question asks how likely I am to attend meetings in: > North America > Asia > Europe > > I find it hard to answer this question. > > I am less likely to attend meetings in the US than I am to attend them > in Canada... Yes, well that's why we added a free text box to the questionnaire. It's hard to design multiple choice questions that can capture subtlety. Brian _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf