> Date: 2005-08-09 09:16 > From: Brian E Carpenter <brc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > The question on the table since RFC 3774 is: why don't we > execute the transition to Draft Standard more often, > otherwise known as: why are there so few implementation > reports at http://www.ietf.org/IESG/implementation.html > (three this year, I believe)? One issue has been identified and discussed, but as far as I know has not been resolved. Consider RFCs 3885 through 3888 produced by the MSGTRK working group; three of the four are Standards Track at Proposed, all were published September 2004. The PS RFCs could have advanced to Draft as early as March 2005 (six months) but for one problem; advancement requires that the WG Chair produce documentation on interoperable implementations. So why hasn't the MSGTRK WG worked on advancement to Draft? Well, there isn't a MSGTRK WG any more (and therefore no MSGTRK WG Chair); the IESG disbanded it. Will the IESG reinstate the WG to advance the three Standards Track RFCs to Draft? _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf