On Sat, 2005-08-06 at 19:07 -0400, Brian Rosen wrote: > I notice that we have stopped being interested in running code. Not everywhere. For the IPFIX protocol, which is currently still in draft status, there where 6 different implementations, both of collector and meters, showing up at the Interop meeting, which took place just before the IETF63. This helped a lot in finding a number of ambigueties, which caused the document editors to revise/reword some parts of the document and will also provide a lot of input, eg common mistakes/misassumptions to the implementation guidelines. Maybe there should be requirement that before having going to Last Call there should at least be 2 separate implementations when a document is created by a working group? Greets, Jeroen
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf