Re: Review panel's role

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi, Pekka,

I rarely if ever argue with you about protocol stuff, because you're pretty good at protocols, and our process IS a protocol, but I do see "returned to clear DISCUSS" items on the IESG telechat agendas. So, I bet you're right, but there is running code that we actually DO end up sliding to the next telechat, at least some of the time.

Spencer


Documents don't need to be reballoted [in IESG] to be approved (after being revised). This is up to the nature of the comments/changes and the AD's confidence that the discusses have been addressed to the satisfaction of commenters, and that new text doesn't have issues.

If time is of the essence, the chair or whoever could certainly take up the document from the editor; I've done so personally in a couple of cases.

In all honesty, there are a lot of things that you do that I wish we all did, and this is one of them :-)

Spencer


_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]