Re: On standards review panel and division of work

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I think the concept of separating the responsibility for final document review and approval from the responsibility for chartering and managing working workings. Yes, there are some tricky details. But it looks like they are solvable and the approach leads to improvement in several regards.

Yours,
Joel M. Halpern

At 06:09 AM 8/4/2005, John C Klensin wrote:
See my note posted a short time ago (which was written before seeing yours). But, yes. This is exactly the thing I was commenting about in that note. It is, at some level, a detail. It can be tuned in any of a number of ways. I picked one, not quite at random. You suggest a different one above. I think we need to decide the concept is worthwhile (I'm not sure there is consensus on that yet), and then sort through these details. IMO, the "I don't like that detail so the proposal is invalid and should not be considered" approach is just not a productive way to proceed.

        john


_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]