Re: project management (from Town Hall meeting)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 4 Aug 2005, Henk Uijterwaal wrote:
This is another result of doing work with volunteers.  If somebody is
interested in a topic but not in another, then there is nothing that
can stop him from working on the first topic, even if it might be
beneficial for overall progress to finish the topic first.

Well, at least there is a mitigation factor (in theory).

Set the maximum amount of documents that can be worked in parallel. If folks want their own document added as a WG document, they'll have to work on the existing documents out of the door first. (Obviously, this is a tool WG chairs can already use; I'd certainly be interested if the model has been executed successfully or unsuccessfully.)

This also requires that documents with ineffective editors get raplaced reasonably quickly so there's always progress going on (and the proposers of new work can't say, "but the existing ones aren't going anywhere [because the editor isn't doing the job]").

--
Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]