Re: Keeping this IETF's schedule in the future...?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



In message <E32465322FD83BF1D45007F6@AS-S2N>, John C Klensin writes:
>
>
>--On Wednesday, August 03, 2005 09:16 -0400 "Andrew G. Malis" 
><andymalis@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>> I did notice fewer people in the bar than usual.  Given how
>>> much work gets done at bar bofs, that's significant.
>>
>> I suspect that's due to what they charge in the hotel bar more
>> than anything else! :-)
>
>To the extent to which bar bof meetings are semi- or completely 
>spontaneous (and many are), having multiple bars in separate 
>buildings doesnâ??t help much either.   I've gone looking for 
>people late evening, tried two places in one building and one in 
>the other, and given up.  And I've mounted that intense a 
>search only once.
>

We've had that discussion many times -- think of the post-Vienna 
discussions.  Multiple hotels/bars are definitely a bad idea.  But 
they're not always avoidable.

		--Steven M. Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb



_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]