Re: Keeping this IETF's schedule in the future...?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 3 Aug 2005, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
In message <20050803104444.GC16624@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Tim Chown writes:
On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 12:38:28PM +0200, Joerg Ott wrote:

What do other people think?

Add an extra 15 mins for lunch, it makes it so less 'rushed'.

That would be a very good idea.

Personally, I don't see much need for lengthening the lunch; having the break at 1.5 hrs makes the lunch (hopefully) more focused at the essentials (gather the company quickly; find food _close_ by; order; talk; eat; get back).

But regardless of that, IMHO the breaks could be reduced to 15 mins or so. That would allow us at least 2-3 additional 1hr slots, which would probably be very useful due to numerous scheduling conflicts at least I've experienced.

--
Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]