Re: Re: I'm not the microphone police, but ...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Well, the one that really pushes my button is when someone, probably a vendor, but even sometimes an operator, comes to the mic and says "The Really Big SDO needs this work." Its impossible to know if this person has any official standing at the Really Big SDO, or if it is a possition that that person would just wish that SDO would take.

John

Two related points here - one is that we do have "official liasions" on the IAB website (at http://www.iab.org/liaisons/index.html), so it is theoretically possible to identify these liasions, but not everyone knows about this, and not everyone thinks to look, and the second is that a number of interesting communities don't have an official liasion to/from the IETF, so John's statement very clearly applies in these cases.

These communities may not even be SDOs - they can be operator consortia, vendor consortia, industry consortia, or Lord knows what.

When I was attending 3GPP, Stephen Hayes was the official liasion, and in my experience he was VERY conservative about saying "this is what 3GPP needs/wants/expects". Not everyone who stands at the microphone is as consciencious as Stephen. I was in one working group meeting yesterday where two people were arguing about the timeframe an external SDO really expects from the IETF - that's not helpful to the IETF or to the external SDO (who may get what it wants from the IETF, or what someone thought it should want).

Thanks,

Spencer


_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]