Re: Port numbers and IPv6

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>     > From: Ned Freed <ned.freed@xxxxxxxxxxx>

> Let me make sure I understand you here:

>     > IMAP4 has the characteristic that you often have a huge number of
>     > incoming connections, only a few of which are active at any given time.
>     > Designing servers to accomodate huge numbers of connections is a bit
>     > tricky, but workable: ...
>     > The 65536 limit, OTOH, has to be dealt with by using multiple server IP
>     > addresses, which in turn usually require multiple interfaces ...
>     > ... that doesn't mean nobody is hitting the 65536 limit imposed by
>     > source port numbers. They are, it causes problems

> You're saying that there are servers which have close to (or more) than 65K
> connections to a *single client IP address* (i.e. it may be a NAT, with a
> number of hosts behind it)? (If a server is talking to a number of different
> client IP addresses, it can have up to 65K connections to *each*.)

Yes, that is exactly what I am saying (now for the third time).

				Ned

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]