works for me (assuming that you include non-IETF documents when you say "IETF review documents") Scott ---- >From hartmans@xxxxxxx Thu Jul 14 18:12:46 2005 X-Original-To: sob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Delivered-To: sob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To: sob@xxxxxxxxxxx (Scott Bradner) Cc: ietf@xxxxxxxx Subject: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-narten-iana-considerations-rfc2434bis-02.txt References: <20050714165238.9899741F6D8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> From: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@xxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 18:12:40 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20050714165238.9899741F6D8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Scott Bradner's message of "Thu, 14 Jul 2005 12:52:38 -0400 (EDT)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii would it be reasonable to just say that we are going to always last call IETF review documents? Personally I'd approve of this option unless people think it is too restrictive. _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf