Re: RFC 2434 term "IESG approval" (Re: IANA Action: Assignment of an IPV6 Hop-by-hop Option)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Robert Elz wrote:
    Date:        Wed, 29 Jun 2005 17:39:37 -0400
    From:        Margaret Wasserman <margaret@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    Message-ID:  <p0620070ebee8c42a0174@[10.0.0.171]>

| The arguments against what the IESG has done seem, | mostly, to be that we should have gotten IETF consensus before
  | making  a decision.

That is absolutely not it.

The argument is that the IESG used the wrong criteria in making
their own decision.

Since neither 2434 nor 2780 lays down any criteria, I don't
understand how to measure "wrong."

   Brian


_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]