On 07/01/2005 13:02 PM, Ken Carlberg allegedly wrote: > My view is that your impression of the reaction is incorrect. in > taking the position that respondents can be classified as either: > a) being satisfied with the IESG *decision*, b) dissatisfied or > uncomfortable with the decision, or c) could not be clearly > determined by the content of their response, I came up with the > following list. You can add me to the "satisfied" column. The IESG is asked to take positions and to lead (despite what a few think). That's risky -- no matter what they do they get criticism from somewhere. Maybe they didn't *phrase* the announcement perfectly, but the decision is correct. Something like this must have a serious, long-term IETF review. We need to take the overall design of the Internet into account and not just be administrators. _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf