Re: RFC 2434 term "IESG approval" (Re: IANA Action: Assignment of an IPV6 Hop-by-hop Option)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hans Kruse wrote:
...
but otherwise I _cannot_ see how the _content_ of the option could harm a device that does not want to deal with it.

If it interferes with congestion management elsewhere along the path, it can potentially damage
every other packet stream. This is a *very* complex discussion of course.

   Brian


_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]