> > We can reasonably delegate a determination of > > definitional adequacy to an individual, but decisions > > about "good" or "bad", or recommendations to use or not > > use something, require community consensus. > > nice, simple language. seems to capture the distinction -- and the > requirement -- nicely. I disagree. We normally require a higher standard than community consensus for technical specifications - we require both consensus and technical soundness. Technical soundness is determined by both community feedback and IESG review. I don't see why we should impose a lesser standard for IP options. Keith _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf