TIME OUT. 1. There was a last call for a BCP 2. It was suggested the BCP was at least in part based on erroneous data 3. Examples were given to support that claim. 4. Harald shared that he was irritated (thereby irritating the few of us who weren't). 5. You (gja) write "you think this past week is the first time anyone's had to put up with "mr Anderson" ?" There are those that can see the paradigm shift in the above timeline and those that are the paradigm shift in the above timeline. Please don't confuse this with an RFC. Best regards, Nick Staff -----Original Message----- From: ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx [mailto:ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of grenville armitage Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2005 4:41 AM To: ietf@xxxxxxxx Subject: Re: Proper behaviour towards irritating persons (RE: I'm not going to listen...) Colin Alston wrote: > [...] throwing your toys out of the cot as soon as you perceive > something as a personal attack certainly doesn't mirror the attitude > that should be conveyed on these lists. "as soon as" ? you think this past week is the first time anyone's had to put up with "mr Anderson" ? that's funny. no, really. cheers, gja (i've hugged my killfile today...) _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf