Re: Protocol Action: 'Pre-Shared Key Ciphersuites for Transport Layer Security (TLS)' to Proposed Standard

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



 In your previous mail you wrote:

   The IESG has approved the following document:
   
   - 'Pre-Shared Key Ciphersuites for Transport Layer Security (TLS) '
      <draft-ietf-tls-psk-09.txt> as a Proposed Standard
   
=> this document seems to go in the wrong way: pre-shared secrets
are known to be weaker than certificates and TLS has already many
problems with its misuses (for instance no client verification or
poor server certificate validation).
 I remember a similar discussion about IKEv2 but in this case pre-shared
secrets were kept for compatibility... I can't see why no argument
against pre-shared secrets applies for the TLS case. Perhaps a security area
director can help me? BTW, I don't buy the "limited CPU power" argument
without real world examples.

Regards

Francis.Dupont@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]