> Date: 2005-06-23 12:45 > From: Ned Freed <ned.freed@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Which in turn works because there are always security considerations - the > closest thing to valid empty security considerations section we have is one > that says "this entire document is about security". A section that simply says > "there are no security considerations here" is invalid on its face and > indicates insufficient review has been done. Possible counterexamples: RFC 2234: Security is truly believed to be irrelevant to this document. RFC 3935: Considering security is one of the core principles of sound network engineering for the Internet. Apart from that, it's not relevant to this memo. _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf