On 6/9/05, Bruce Lilly <blilly@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Conversely, if the IESG does regard the matter as important, it could: > 1. direct the IETF Secretariat to enforce the rule Bruce, ID-Checklist is only for I-Ds that are submitted to the IESG for publication. It's not the cost of checking that is a problem, rather, it's useful to allow earlier drafts of I-Ds to not be fully fleshed out (thus they're .. well .. drafts?) Bill _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf