Re: Uneccesary slowness.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Bob/Steve -

I think some static got in the way.

Bob - I think what Steve meant was that for any given product absent any other competing demands on time, it should take "n" days for stage "x".

Project management 101. 

Project management 102 is about dealing with a lot of competing demands and still getting work through. E.g. avoiding "thrashing".

:-)

Mike



At 02:39 PM 5/23/2005, Steve Crocker wrote:
Well, I'm probably living in a very old universe, which may be out of date.

What numbers are more appropriate?

Thanks,

Steve

Bob Braden wrote:
 
  *> time for vacations, sick leave and day job, etc.  (My intuition is that   *> it shouldn't take more than about 2 days to get through each part of the   *> process if nothing else were in the way.
Which universe are you living in?
Bob

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]