Margaret Wasserman wrote: > Are there really a significant number of people who think it > should be otherwise? Sometimes an apparently "individual submission" might represent the views of a "community" which just prefers to be no IETF WG for its own reasons (e.g. because a WG was closed). Bye, Frank -- <http://purl.net/xyzzy/home/test/spf-council.htm> _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf