Re: More pretty graphs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Bill, thank you for developing this tool and for posting the note about it to ietf@xxxxxxxxx

Spencer

----- Original Message ----- From: "Bill Fenner" <fenner@xxxxxxxxx>


Based on the positive feedback from my RFC-Editor graph, I've updated some work that I started some time ago - a set of graphs, two per working group. These graphs show inter-document dependencies(*) of all I-Ds that are working group documents, and one "hop" forwards and back - for example, if a foowg document depends on draft-fenner-great-stuff, then the individual draft shows up, but not *that* document's dependencies. The two graphs are <wgname>.pdf, which includes relationships that my script could determine are not normative, and <wgname>-norm.pdf which does not. Sometimes when the full graph is too much, the -norm graph is still readable.

It's an interesting way to see what relationships exist, and what
other groups / documents may be referencing a given WG's work.

http://rtg.ietf.org/~fenner/ietf/deps/viz/

Each page includes a key for what the shapes and colors mean.
Feedback is welcome.

Bill




_______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]