Margaret, > At 10:50 AM +0200 5/11/05, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > >But that gives very limited insight into what is holding it up, except > >for a few cases. If it's in EDIT state you get no useful information about > >issues and progress, for example. > > Also, if there is the equivalent of the I-D tracker for the RFC > Editor Queue (where correspondence and major state transitions for a > document are captured and can be seen later), I am not sure where to > find it. The RFC editor queue is a text document that only seems to > capture the current state of the document (EDIT, AUTH48, etc.). I'm personally not to sure about the accuracy of some of those states. I found a couple that I am personally involved in that are still listed as in the AUTH state, but where all of the authors have signed off on the document & the RFC Editor has confirmed that we have signed off on it. _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf