Re: improving WG operation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




    Tom> Wouldn't a system of mutual endorsements (a web of trust),
    Tom> suitably loudly broadcast, be an alternative to elaborate
    Tom> committee procedures?  

    > Yes, but it would not really be the IETF.

There's IETF in theory and IETF in practice.

   Also note that I believe that a discussion of whether this alternative
   is a good idea should probably move off the ietf list fairly quickly.

I agree.  As I said, I'm trying to strongly tend to "return to my
seat".  I object to the implied assertion that IETF *couldn't* go in
this direction and remain IETF.  As I also said: I think this time in
history is a unique opportunity to do so.

I'm mostly repeating myself, so: thanks for listening.

-t



_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]