> One way to open up the process would be to allow any participant > to personally request a list of candidates from Nomcom, against > a personal non-disclosure promise. (Not my idea; this was suggested > during last week's IESG retreat.)
=> If we do that we may as well put the list on the web. How do we define "participant"?
There is a difference between having participants who are interested in providing feedback ask for a copy of the list, with a promise of confidentiality, and give feedback - versus having that information publicly available. This sounds useful to me.
I don't think that "participant" really needs to be defined. Those who will be interested are those who are involved. Currently, to obtain input from a more diverse set of people, Nomcomm has to guess who is appropriate to ask & hope that a reasonable sampling of them will be willing/interested in responding.
Alia
_______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf