> What went wrong with ICAR (Improved Cross-Area Review)? It was closed > due to lack of activity; 12 people enlisted as reviewers, just a > single review conducted, the reviewers didn't deliver. I think your conclusion that "the reviewers didn't deliver" might be taken poorly by the reviewers on the list who weren't asked to deliver. Don't blame the reviewers if no I-D authors or WG chairs asked for cross-area review. That only one review was conducted might be taken to mean that only one review was requested. What does that tell us about the process? Adrian _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf