Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 21:20:28 +0100
From: Colin Perkins <csp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID: <c8c3d491c54371c30af777f7ceb38dfb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
| RFC 3555 allows media types to be defined for transport only via RTP.
| The majority of these registrations are under the audio and video
| top-level types, with a small number being under text. Is your
| objection to any media type being defined only for transport via RTP,
| or to text media types being defined only for transport via RTP?
Not to either of those being attempted, but to the expectation that the
"only via RTP" will, or can, ever be enforced.
That is, to your earlier statement ...
Sure, but if the display agent is unaware of the restrictions, it won't
ever be able to receive the media data.
You'd need to be able to show me how that can possibly be true, when I
can trivially easily send e-mail with text/t140 in the Content-Type header.
kre
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf