> -----Original Message----- > From: ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx [mailto:ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On > Behalf Of ned.freed@xxxxxxxxxxx > Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 12:57 PM > To: Colin Perkins > Cc: iesg@xxxxxxxx; ietf@xxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: Last Call: 'Media Type Specifications and > Registration Procedures' to BCP [snip] > I'm quite sympathetc to the underlying problem, but IMO this change is > unacceptable, in that in order to make it work the fact that > a given subtype is > intended for restricted usage would have to be known to the > display agent. The > whole idea of having top-level types is predicated on not > needing this sort of > exception information. Ned, how would you reconcile the current text in your document with the practice specified in RFC 3555? It's been alleged that the documents are not in alignment. -Scott- _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf