And I didn't say "voting"; that was Jeroen.
The free site I found says "voting"; of course, what the IETF can use such things for is only straw polls. But in a case like the present one, I think that is a reasonable way of finding out what the centre of gravity of opinion is.
In ASCII art:
/\
Consensus: ____/ \___/\ Rough Consensus ____/ \___/\___
Badly phrased question: ___/\____/\____/\____/\___
(I'm reasonably serious about that)
Brian
Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote:
From: ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx [mailto:ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Jeroen Massar
On Wed, 2005-04-06 at 11:52 +0200, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
Well, I thought I'd try something daring. We have people arguing about xml versus nroff (again). If you write Internet Drafts, try this toy (and only vote once, please...). If the toy doesn't work, don't blame me... I just found the site with Google.
http://www.internationalvoting.com/int3/ask.cgi?pid=22-143
As this is the tools discussion after all, might it maybe be a good tool
to have a voting tool for the IETF?
When the IETF Chair says 'voting' you should take it as a metaphor, I believe.
Dan
_______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf