Re: FW: Why?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



At 22:09 11/03/2005, Kevin Loch wrote:
If you really want to jump start n^2, find a way to convince the RIR's to require demonstration of IPv6 deployment for subsequent (non initial) IPv4 allocations.

I fear that we overlook a point you make here: "RIRs require demonstration". I suppose that if you had to desmonstrate you need a mobile or a phone number, the expansion of the telephone network and then of mobiles would have been slower.


Has someone compared the IPv6, IPv4, telephone and mobile number/address allocation figures? It takes me 10 minutes in a supermarket to get an operational mobile. The only thing it misses nowaday is an IP address. May be you will recall that in 2000 the telephone industry had asked for 2 IP blocks and ICANN responded (in July/Aug?) they could use the "virtual NAT" which is HTTP.1.1.
jfc





_______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]