Re: FW: Why?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 07:04:52AM -0500, Joel M. Halpern wrote:
> 
> Not needing NAT is a minor value add for IPv6.  But we have already seen 
> several major corporations publicly indicate that they intend to use NAT 
> with IPv6, even though they can get enough public address space.

Do you have pointers to these indicators?   I assume the reason is lack of
PI space, or is it a mixture of the other commonly cited reasons?

Tim

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]