On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 07:04:52AM -0500, Joel M. Halpern wrote: > > Not needing NAT is a minor value add for IPv6. But we have already seen > several major corporations publicly indicate that they intend to use NAT > with IPv6, even though they can get enough public address space. Do you have pointers to these indicators? I assume the reason is lack of PI space, or is it a mixture of the other commonly cited reasons? Tim _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf