On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 11:40:39 +0200, Harald Tveit Alvestrand said: > I do sympathize somewhat with the people who just want "someone to take > care of this" and choose not to comment in detail on the document - we have > to make sure they know what's going on, but we cannot force anyone to > actively participate in the process. Like most IETF processes, it becomes > much easier to participate after reading the documents - but that IS a > significant investment of time. Hmm.. put me down as somebody who read through them as in depth as I could manage at the time, and want to be listed under "Will somebody else please push things in the direction of Scenario O?". Unfortunately, I'm even worse at such things than most IETF'ers, so don't have much more to contribute on this one. OK.. At least now i'm not in the silent majority anymore. ;)
Attachment:
pgpOvMQpqh9I6.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf