--On onsdag, oktober 06, 2004 17:50:04 -0400 John C Klensin <john-ietf@xxxxxxx> wrote:
--On Wednesday, October 06, 2004 1:07 PM +0200 Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I do think our thoughts run very much in parallel - I'll be interested to hear more of why you think the "scenario O" organizational format will make it hard to make those support functions work.
Again a misunderstanding -- I don't see "Scenario O" as being either better or worse in regard to the above than any other scenario. My concern is with the definition of the Clerk function, which is scenario-independent.
Thanks for the clarification!
I thought you might be pointing at the "one staff member - rest of the work is contracts", which is a common feature to scenarios C and O. If "all" that is required is to modify the description of the "clerk" function, that needs to be done before we call for interested parties - it is not on the critical path to adopting one scenario for implementation (although all clarification early is good).
Harald
_______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf