Hello everybody, though, I have been silent mostly throughout the discussion on the mailing list (playing mostly catch up with all of you on the mailing list), I do have an opinion. First of all, I would like to state my respect for everybody writing documents and doing the ground work for us being the state that we may do some early conclusions based on the material. I think the work some of you have been doing is impressive! I would believe that in this point of time Scenario O would be the starting point from which we should move forward. I understand that both scenarios have pros and cons, but I think in Scenario O the pros outplay the cons. Mainly I believe the usage of existing, well known organizations make the scenario O less risky. In addition IMHO, it allows us to move much faster through the process. This means less work, and better results. However, I think there is still some work to be done before the proposal is "good enough" for implementation. Especially, there has to be more details how the plan is implemented in practice. Cheers, Jonne. PS. Is there a reason why the scenarios O and C are not published as Internet-Drafts? Or have I just missed it? -- Jonne Soininen Nokia Tel: +358 40 527 46 34 E-mail: jonne.soininen@xxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf