RE: Time horizon, contingencies, and destinations (was scenarios 0 and C)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



At 10:59 AM -0700 9/27/04, Tony Hain wrote:
 At the
same time, if we go down the path of more stable centralized fund-raising by
the scenario C proposed Independent Corporation, there are likely to be some
strong strings (ropes/chains) attached to that funding with the
implicit/explicit intent to influence the outcome of the technical efforts.
Call it a membership organization or not, the outcome of this environment is
that those who are providing the funds will be in a position to demand their
way on technical issues through the threat of pulling the money.

If the Independent Corporation were intended to be the IETF, I would agree, but I with an incorporated administrative entity, I don't think this is an issue. At least in my reading, neither O or C proposes any changes to the standards process or ISOC's role in it. regards, Ted Hardie


_______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]